Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 63678 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 63678 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Donnelly Smith
to entertain a 974.06 motion brought by a person who is not in custody under sentence of a court.” Jessen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26267 - 2017-09-21
to entertain a 974.06 motion brought by a person who is not in custody under sentence of a court.” Jessen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26267 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donnelly Smith
, J.[1] Donnelly Smith appeals from orders denying his motions to withdraw his guilty pleas in two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26267 - 2006-08-21
, J.[1] Donnelly Smith appeals from orders denying his motions to withdraw his guilty pleas in two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26267 - 2006-08-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of Kestler’s motor vehicle was transformed into a custodial arrest before probable cause existed to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32258 - 2014-09-15
of Kestler’s motor vehicle was transformed into a custodial arrest before probable cause existed to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32258 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Arnold E. Smith v. Douglas G. Slock
five feet of their joint property line. There is no dispute that in 1976, one of the prior owners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10807 - 2017-09-20
five feet of their joint property line. There is no dispute that in 1976, one of the prior owners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10807 - 2017-09-20
Arnold E. Smith v. Douglas G. Slock
of their joint property line. There is no dispute that in 1976, one of the prior owners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10807 - 2005-03-31
of their joint property line. There is no dispute that in 1976, one of the prior owners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10807 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
-degree sexual assault of a child; to make a joint sentencing recommendation for time served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133790 - 2015-01-25
-degree sexual assault of a child; to make a joint sentencing recommendation for time served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133790 - 2015-01-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postdispositional motion where she contended that trial counsel was ineffective (1) in advising J.W. to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208806 - 2018-02-27
postdispositional motion where she contended that trial counsel was ineffective (1) in advising J.W. to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208806 - 2018-02-27
[MS WORD]
FA-5008V: Modification Instructions
of Motion and Motion to Change: Legal Custody, Physical Placement, Child Support, Maintenance, Arrears
/formdisplay/FA-5008V_instructions.doc?formNumber=FA-5008V&formType=Instructions&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-03-03
of Motion and Motion to Change: Legal Custody, Physical Placement, Child Support, Maintenance, Arrears
/formdisplay/FA-5008V_instructions.doc?formNumber=FA-5008V&formType=Instructions&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-03-03
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
to construe Nigl’s petition as a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06, he is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6651 - 2017-09-20
to construe Nigl’s petition as a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06, he is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6651 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Daniel E. Monge appeals an order denying his motion for sentence credit. Monge’s appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819266 - 2024-07-03
). Daniel E. Monge appeals an order denying his motion for sentence credit. Monge’s appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819266 - 2024-07-03