Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 29942 for des.

[PDF] State v. Kelley D. Avery
to due process is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Pettit, 171 Wis.2d 627, 639, 492
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13101 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jessica C. v. State
. Although our review of the trial court's decision is de novo, see De Bruin v. State, 140 Wis.2d 631, 635
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10462 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] The Kraemer Company, LLC v. Sauk County Board of Adjustment
; and (3) de novo review. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548 N.W.2d 57 (1996). Great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3056 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Davon R. Malcom
is a question of law which we review de No. 01-0506-CR 6 novo. Id. Finally, the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3646 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Fontaine Baker
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4253 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 151
, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72340 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Department of Regulation & Licensing v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
weight deference, and de novo review. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis.2d 274, 284, 548 N.W.2d 57, 61 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12091 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mark Anderson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
. of De Pere. 2002 WI App 315 NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5144 - 2017-09-19

Milwaukee County v. Juneau County
coverage. STANDARD OF REVIEW ΒΆ4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5821 - 2005-03-31

Gordon K. Aaron v. Byron Axel
decision to grant summary judgment de novo. See Barillari v. City of Milwaukee, 194 Wis. 2d 247, 256, 533
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2343 - 2005-03-31