Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 68343 for did.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 68343 for did.
State v. Melvin E. Vance
White, Vance’s girlfriend at the time, testified she was a passenger in the van but did not know what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7026 - 2005-03-31
White, Vance’s girlfriend at the time, testified she was a passenger in the van but did not know what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7026 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did not repeat the question. Instead, the prosecutor asked Diede if the case was “a run-of-the-mill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31127 - 2007-12-10
did not repeat the question. Instead, the prosecutor asked Diede if the case was “a run-of-the-mill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31127 - 2007-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his right to direct review of the alleged breach of the plea agreement because he did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110255 - 2017-09-21
his right to direct review of the alleged breach of the plea agreement because he did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110255 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have been raised because: (1) his trial counsel did not hire an No. 2011AP642 4 expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90212 - 2014-09-15
have been raised because: (1) his trial counsel did not hire an No. 2011AP642 4 expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90212 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
deception did not render Cazares-Herrera’s consent involuntary and use of the DNA sample did not exceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93175 - 2013-02-20
deception did not render Cazares-Herrera’s consent involuntary and use of the DNA sample did not exceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93175 - 2013-02-20
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Robert R. Schultz
Amendment. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15158 - 2017-09-21
Amendment. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15158 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, and that Tarik did not have good cause for failing to contact Lauren and Quincy. Following a dispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55216 - 2010-10-06
, and that Tarik did not have good cause for failing to contact Lauren and Quincy. Following a dispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55216 - 2010-10-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
concluded that Hibbler No. 2020AP1180-CR 3 did not lack substantial capacity to appreciate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414590 - 2021-08-24
concluded that Hibbler No. 2020AP1180-CR 3 did not lack substantial capacity to appreciate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414590 - 2021-08-24
[PDF]
State v. Douglas E. Fitch
in the courtroom shortly before Fitch entered his plea, Mrs. Fitch gave Fitch her support and did not say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4720 - 2017-09-19
in the courtroom shortly before Fitch entered his plea, Mrs. Fitch gave Fitch her support and did not say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4720 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. At trial, Queen testified that the drugs belonged to Branson. Branson did not testify. The details
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237841 - 2019-03-21
. At trial, Queen testified that the drugs belonged to Branson. Branson did not testify. The details
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237841 - 2019-03-21