Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 29410 for er.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 29410 for er.
State v. Suzette M. Ward
erred when it instructed the jury that a “person responsible for the welfare of a child” under § 948.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14446 - 2005-03-31
erred when it instructed the jury that a “person responsible for the welfare of a child” under § 948.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14446 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2013AP1904-CR 2 without a hearing. 1 He claims that the trial court erred by refusing to discharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110486 - 2017-09-21
No. 2013AP1904-CR 2 without a hearing. 1 He claims that the trial court erred by refusing to discharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110486 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, as party to a crime; (2) trial counsel was ineffective on multiple grounds; and (3) the court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817450 - 2024-06-27
, as party to a crime; (2) trial counsel was ineffective on multiple grounds; and (3) the court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817450 - 2024-06-27
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15192 - 2005-03-31
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15192 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, these findings are not clearly erroneous. ¶19 Finally, Amidzich asserts that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65190 - 2011-05-31
, these findings are not clearly erroneous. ¶19 Finally, Amidzich asserts that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65190 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Discussion ¶9 Hodge contends that the circuit court erred when it declined to exclude expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84169 - 2014-09-15
. Discussion ¶9 Hodge contends that the circuit court erred when it declined to exclude expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84169 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Lawson Bender v. Karmen Lindhal
, the requirements of § 853.03(2), STATS., were not satisfied, and the trial court erred in concluding otherwise
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8397 - 2017-09-19
, the requirements of § 853.03(2), STATS., were not satisfied, and the trial court erred in concluding otherwise
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8397 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we also conclude that there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the court erred by amending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696164 - 2023-08-29
, we also conclude that there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the court erred by amending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696164 - 2023-08-29
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2005-03-31
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven Swenson
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Swenson argues: (1) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10896 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Swenson argues: (1) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10896 - 2005-03-31