Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 24992 for extending.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 24992 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to serve his revocation terms.2 Giegler was released to extended supervision in 2012, but in 2018 his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362354 - 2021-05-04
to serve his revocation terms.2 Giegler was released to extended supervision in 2012, but in 2018 his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362354 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Ruiz
. No. 2004AP886-CR 3 year periods of confinement and extended supervision. After the summary rejection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25413 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2004AP886-CR 3 year periods of confinement and extended supervision. After the summary rejection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25413 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
to recommend a total sentence of three years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91496 - 2013-01-08
to recommend a total sentence of three years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91496 - 2013-01-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement followed by three years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078680 - 2026-02-17
of initial confinement followed by three years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078680 - 2026-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
his sentence of twenty years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34314 - 2008-10-14
his sentence of twenty years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34314 - 2008-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement, to be followed by four years of extended supervision, to be served consecutively. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
confinement, to be followed by four years of extended supervision, to be served consecutively. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
the duration of extended supervision to the trial court’s discretion.[2] The trial court imposed a fifteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33911 - 2008-09-02
the duration of extended supervision to the trial court’s discretion.[2] The trial court imposed a fifteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33911 - 2008-09-02
State v. Daniel E.
that the termination order is invalid because he was not properly notified of a request to extend a CHIPS[1] order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16063 - 2005-03-31
that the termination order is invalid because he was not properly notified of a request to extend a CHIPS[1] order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16063 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the State for an aggregate sentence of three years of initial confinement and three years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245274 - 2019-08-14
with the State for an aggregate sentence of three years of initial confinement and three years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245274 - 2019-08-14
State v. Jared J.
only three and one-half months remained on the dispositional order and determined that it could extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31
only three and one-half months remained on the dispositional order and determined that it could extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31