Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 21553 for warrants.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 21553 for warrants.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Fields, testifying on Jelks’s behalf, concluded that commitment was not warranted because Jelks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33700 - 2014-09-15
. Fields, testifying on Jelks’s behalf, concluded that commitment was not warranted because Jelks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33700 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Allan Lloyd Waldo
Waldo waived his revocation hearing and, on January 3, 1995, the final revocation order and warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3655 - 2017-09-19
Waldo waived his revocation hearing and, on January 3, 1995, the final revocation order and warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3655 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was no apparent emergency or signs of distress to warrant a welfare check and alternatively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181361 - 2017-09-21
that there was no apparent emergency or signs of distress to warrant a welfare check and alternatively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Boyd W. Pigman
warrant, Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 770, incident to a lawful arrest, Scales, 64 Wis. 2d at 493, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4360 - 2017-09-19
warrant, Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 770, incident to a lawful arrest, Scales, 64 Wis. 2d at 493, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4360 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a “bulge” in Harris’s buttocks area. After a computer check showed the existence of a felony “VOP” warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35197 - 2009-01-12
a “bulge” in Harris’s buttocks area. After a computer check showed the existence of a felony “VOP” warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35197 - 2009-01-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
a warrant. ¶4 Trial counsel did not immediately file a suppression motion to challenge the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29887 - 2014-09-15
a warrant. ¶4 Trial counsel did not immediately file a suppression motion to challenge the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29887 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
that the use of Bayes’ Rule was sufficient to warrant a new trial, and McLemore does not pursue that facet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=309114 - 2020-12-01
that the use of Bayes’ Rule was sufficient to warrant a new trial, and McLemore does not pursue that facet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=309114 - 2020-12-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
the circuit court determined was improperly admitted and warranted a new trial— came from the State’s expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48112 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court determined was improperly admitted and warranted a new trial— came from the State’s expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48112 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Linda M. Graff
facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion. See id. at 21. The question under this test is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6045 - 2017-09-19
facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion. See id. at 21. The question under this test is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6045 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
). Whether the facts, as found, warrant suppression of the evidence, however, is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39337 - 2014-09-15
). Whether the facts, as found, warrant suppression of the evidence, however, is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39337 - 2014-09-15