Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31001 - 31010 of 62363 for child support.
Search results 31001 - 31010 of 62363 for child support.
State v. Michael D. Singleton
that the trial court correct the record. In support of its argument, the State submitted affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court correct the record. In support of its argument, the State submitted affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Seidling’s claims, we would need to scour the entire record, find supporting facts, research supporting law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017718 - 2025-09-30
of Seidling’s claims, we would need to scour the entire record, find supporting facts, research supporting law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017718 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
such as coercion, the lack of a factual basis to support the charge, ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017896 - 2025-10-01
such as coercion, the lack of a factual basis to support the charge, ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017896 - 2025-10-01
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Lucho Phillips
is supported by the facts in the original complaint. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 89, 414 N.W.2d 311, 313
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7963 - 2017-09-19
is supported by the facts in the original complaint. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 89, 414 N.W.2d 311, 313
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7963 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
that the referee's findings support a determination that Attorney Edgar has met her burden to establish by clear
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171491 - 2017-09-21
that the referee's findings support a determination that Attorney Edgar has met her burden to establish by clear
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171491 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
4 brief, Jaworski contends that “the transcript is wrong and that is a fact.” The only support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470419 - 2022-01-11
4 brief, Jaworski contends that “the transcript is wrong and that is a fact.” The only support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470419 - 2022-01-11
[PDF]
State v. Michael R.T.
is insufficient to support a finding of disorderly conduct. This court disagrees and affirms the order. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14335 - 2014-09-15
is insufficient to support a finding of disorderly conduct. This court disagrees and affirms the order. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14335 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Otis J. Braxton
not support a finding that Braxton’s actions were reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15302 - 2017-09-21
not support a finding that Braxton’s actions were reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15302 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Toby J. Vandenberg
an improper exercise of sentencing No. 98-0070-CR 3 discretion. The record does not support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13503 - 2017-09-21
an improper exercise of sentencing No. 98-0070-CR 3 discretion. The record does not support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13503 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to a crime and as a repeater. He argues there was insufficient evidence at trial to support the verdict. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48274 - 2010-03-22
to a crime and as a repeater. He argues there was insufficient evidence at trial to support the verdict. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48274 - 2010-03-22