Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31001 - 31010 of 74552 for public records.
Search results 31001 - 31010 of 74552 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the court, and we affirm if the trial court applied the correct law to the facts of record and reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56188 - 2010-11-01
of the court, and we affirm if the trial court applied the correct law to the facts of record and reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56188 - 2010-11-01
Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Department of Health and Family Services
. It would be contrary to public policy to allow review of the department’s decision after months or years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3012 - 2005-03-31
. It would be contrary to public policy to allow review of the department’s decision after months or years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3012 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
as a sexual assault. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.19(1), 939.62 (1989– 90). The Record does not give a reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29707 - 2014-09-15
as a sexual assault. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.19(1), 939.62 (1989– 90). The Record does not give a reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29707 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jody Mayo
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of William E. Schmaal, assistant state public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11877 - 2005-03-31
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of William E. Schmaal, assistant state public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11877 - 2005-03-31
Richard Weyenberg v. Rod Kolpien
-recorded statement demonstrates that Freeman would testify that the defendant accelerated as he approached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13067 - 2005-03-31
-recorded statement demonstrates that Freeman would testify that the defendant accelerated as he approached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13067 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the record, but evidently involved conspiracy to distribute cocaine. No. 2007AP1464-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33032 - 2014-09-15
in the record, but evidently involved conspiracy to distribute cocaine. No. 2007AP1464-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33032 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Corey Robert Saxby
. Saxby asserts this is so because the record does not show that Attorney Grable ever told the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6297 - 2017-09-19
. Saxby asserts this is so because the record does not show that Attorney Grable ever told the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6297 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the record shows that the circuit court made a “reasoned application of the appropriate legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68369 - 2011-07-25
the record shows that the circuit court made a “reasoned application of the appropriate legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68369 - 2011-07-25
[PDF]
IW Enterprises v. Ronald A. Kopas
. Nevertheless, our independent review of the record shows that the court correctly denied the summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6721 - 2017-09-20
. Nevertheless, our independent review of the record shows that the court correctly denied the summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6721 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Rush’s deposition into the record: It’s not in dispute that on October 31, 2017, Ms. Rush entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594757 - 2022-11-29
of Rush’s deposition into the record: It’s not in dispute that on October 31, 2017, Ms. Rush entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594757 - 2022-11-29