Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31011 - 31020 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 31011 - 31020 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
of Milwaukee argues that Stearns’ motion to reopen his case appears to fall within WIS. STAT. § 806.07 (2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27591 - 2014-09-15
of Milwaukee argues that Stearns’ motion to reopen his case appears to fall within WIS. STAT. § 806.07 (2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27591 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kenneth Verhaagh v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
answer. The motion was denied by the administrative law judge who was affirmed by LIRC in its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10396 - 2017-09-20
answer. The motion was denied by the administrative law judge who was affirmed by LIRC in its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10396 - 2017-09-20
Dina Matlin v. City of Sheboygan
BROWN, P.J. Dina Matlin appeals from an order granting the City of Sheboygan’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2986 - 2005-03-31
BROWN, P.J. Dina Matlin appeals from an order granting the City of Sheboygan’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2986 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He challenges the trial court’s handling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34876 - 2008-12-16
and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He challenges the trial court’s handling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34876 - 2008-12-16
[PDF]
State v. Perk E. Thomas
the judgment of conviction and Judge Lamelas presided over and denied Thomas’s postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14969 - 2017-09-21
the judgment of conviction and Judge Lamelas presided over and denied Thomas’s postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14969 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 7, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. His motion was based on the alleged ineffectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57399 - 2010-12-06
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. His motion was based on the alleged ineffectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57399 - 2010-12-06
State v. Robert A. Ragsdale
in denying his motion to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Ragsdale’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6980 - 2005-03-31
in denying his motion to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Ragsdale’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6980 - 2005-03-31
Wayne K. Hagen v. BMM Molding
is frivolous. We deny the motion because we conclude that the appeal raises arguments that do not rise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12813 - 2005-03-31
is frivolous. We deny the motion because we conclude that the appeal raises arguments that do not rise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12813 - 2005-03-31
State v. James W. Rice, Jr.
paraphernalia, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.573(1).[3] Rice contends that his motion to suppress a baggie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2555 - 2005-03-31
paraphernalia, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.573(1).[3] Rice contends that his motion to suppress a baggie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2555 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony T. Jones
. § 961.41(3g)(e) and from an order denying his motion to suppress evidence. Jones contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24927 - 2006-04-26
. § 961.41(3g)(e) and from an order denying his motion to suppress evidence. Jones contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24927 - 2006-04-26