Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31011 - 31020 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31011 - 31020 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 23, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143340 - 2015-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 23, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143340 - 2015-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of the juvenile or the public to hear the case, the court shall enter an order waiving jurisdiction and referring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134447 - 2015-02-10
of the juvenile or the public to hear the case, the court shall enter an order waiving jurisdiction and referring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134447 - 2015-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 23, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41241 - 2009-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 23, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41241 - 2009-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
achieved, will entitle them to reunification. Indeed, in these cases, the court’s orders and the county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35183 - 2009-01-08
achieved, will entitle them to reunification. Indeed, in these cases, the court’s orders and the county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35183 - 2009-01-08
COURT OF APPEALS
with [White’s] affairs.” Id. The Court concluded that “[a]lthough it [was] a close case, … under the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45799 - 2010-02-01
with [White’s] affairs.” Id. The Court concluded that “[a]lthough it [was] a close case, … under the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45799 - 2010-02-01
COURT OF APPEALS
in that way. Id. at 96. ¶9 Put simply, we agree with the trial court that this case is nothing like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95661 - 2013-04-23
in that way. Id. at 96. ¶9 Put simply, we agree with the trial court that this case is nothing like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95661 - 2013-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 20, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72493 - 2011-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 20, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72493 - 2011-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 17, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34875 - 2008-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 17, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34875 - 2008-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court “failed to address the facts that are prominent in this case.” We disagree. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29587 - 2007-07-04
that the circuit court “failed to address the facts that are prominent in this case.” We disagree. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29587 - 2007-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS
but it was not an unreasonable intrusion. The court reasoned that “this is a case where if Mr. Hoard did not live within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31015 - 2007-11-28
but it was not an unreasonable intrusion. The court reasoned that “this is a case where if Mr. Hoard did not live within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31015 - 2007-11-28