Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31011 - 31020 of 50548 for our.

COURT OF APPEALS
are presented with a question of law for our de novo review. See Green County Dep’t of Human Servs. v. H.N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43493 - 2009-11-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
judgment of conviction and the order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077752 - 2026-02-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
,” “jerking,” or “rocking.” We refer to Campbell’s vehicle as “shaking” throughout our opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243823 - 2019-07-16

COURT OF APPEALS
. Our inquiry “‘begins with the language of the statute.’” See State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103241 - 2013-10-21

[PDF] State v. Brian C. Wulff
, because our insufficiency of evidence determination is dispositive, this court need not reach
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17029 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
about what led to the stabbings varied greatly. However, it suffices for our purposes to note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100067 - 2013-09-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
679, 689, 592 N.W.2d 645 (Ct. App. 1999). Our review under this standard is deferential. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75746 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of Brad’s brief2 and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993201 - 2025-08-05

COURT OF APPEALS
videotape evidence in a second phase of the trial does not undermine our confidence in the outcome. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87550 - 2012-09-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
an evidentiary hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781846 - 2024-03-28