Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31011 - 31020 of 55951 for so.
Search results 31011 - 31020 of 55951 for so.
State v. Bernard L. Beyer
” or that “the government’s conduct [is] so enmeshed in a criminal activity that prosecution of the defendant would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13499 - 2005-03-31
” or that “the government’s conduct [is] so enmeshed in a criminal activity that prosecution of the defendant would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13499 - 2005-03-31
Allen L.W. v. Ann Marie W.
actions so he could assert his parental rights. In March, while the paternity actions here remained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9775 - 2005-03-31
actions so he could assert his parental rights. In March, while the paternity actions here remained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9775 - 2005-03-31
Vanessa Henningfeld v. Judith Fischer
decedent intended to revoke his 1988 Will, the trial court recognized that he did not validly do so because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13000 - 2005-03-31
decedent intended to revoke his 1988 Will, the trial court recognized that he did not validly do so because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13000 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
must be so fundamental that a new trial or other relief must be granted, and the error must be obvious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30573 - 2007-10-10
must be so fundamental that a new trial or other relief must be granted, and the error must be obvious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30573 - 2007-10-10
CA Blank Order
these circumstances, it cannot reasonably be argued that Markling’s sentence is so excessive as to shock public
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96337 - 2013-05-06
these circumstances, it cannot reasonably be argued that Markling’s sentence is so excessive as to shock public
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96337 - 2013-05-06
CA Blank Order
during a prior appeal, but failed to do so, and offers no valid reason to excuse such failure.” State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96079 - 2013-04-30
during a prior appeal, but failed to do so, and offers no valid reason to excuse such failure.” State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96079 - 2013-04-30
State v. Charles C. Patterson
ab initio, the court did so. The court explained that the State had to prove that Patterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26088 - 2006-08-02
ab initio, the court did so. The court explained that the State had to prove that Patterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26088 - 2006-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
service requirements even though the consequences for failure to do so may appear to be harsh. Id. at 827
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87850 - 2012-10-09
service requirements even though the consequences for failure to do so may appear to be harsh. Id. at 827
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87850 - 2012-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment, contending that he was never advised of his right to do so, and now claims that those unappealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28987 - 2007-06-26
judgment, contending that he was never advised of his right to do so, and now claims that those unappealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28987 - 2007-06-26
CA Blank Order
of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109722 - 2014-04-01
of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109722 - 2014-04-01