Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31031 - 31040 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 31031 - 31040 of 58458 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
for misdemeanor battery pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06, asserting that the trial court and his attorney failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33184 - 2005-06-25
for misdemeanor battery pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06, asserting that the trial court and his attorney failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33184 - 2005-06-25
State v. Jerry B. Rooni
do not overturn a trial court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5548 - 2013-12-02
do not overturn a trial court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5548 - 2013-12-02
COURT OF APPEALS
challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, the jury instructions, and the assistance provided by his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99032 - 2013-07-09
challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, the jury instructions, and the assistance provided by his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99032 - 2013-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
to believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial.’” Id. at 52 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55967 - 2010-10-25
to believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial.’” Id. at 52 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55967 - 2010-10-25
State v. Thomas L. Gillen
withdrawal. Gillen argues the trial court erred by: (1) finding that his offense was a “fifth or subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2011-06-06
withdrawal. Gillen argues the trial court erred by: (1) finding that his offense was a “fifth or subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2011-06-06
Robert Veriha v. Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Company
there was no coverage. The trial court concluded that because there was no occurrence resulting in bodily injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12971 - 2005-03-31
there was no coverage. The trial court concluded that because there was no occurrence resulting in bodily injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12971 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph Lee Moore
on the day of trial, which is an issue that was already rejected on its merits, and was procedurally barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21256 - 2006-02-06
on the day of trial, which is an issue that was already rejected on its merits, and was procedurally barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21256 - 2006-02-06
[PDF]
Case of the month - December 2012
seen. The doctors who testified at trial agreed that DKA is survivable, and the prognosis for a still
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/dec12.pdf - 2012-12-07
seen. The doctors who testified at trial agreed that DKA is survivable, and the prognosis for a still
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/dec12.pdf - 2012-12-07
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
. John McClellan appeals an order directing the clerk of the trial court not to accept further motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12370 - 2017-09-21
. John McClellan appeals an order directing the clerk of the trial court not to accept further motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12370 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Harold P. Bettinger v. The Anchor Packing Company
Bettinger. Based on the jury's answer to the first question, the trial court dismissed the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7848 - 2017-09-19
Bettinger. Based on the jury's answer to the first question, the trial court dismissed the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7848 - 2017-09-19