Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31041 - 31050 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 31041 - 31050 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
CA Blank Order
to this court’s order. In it, counsel confirms that Leedy wishes to pursue a post-conviction motion regarding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98637 - 2013-06-24
to this court’s order. In it, counsel confirms that Leedy wishes to pursue a post-conviction motion regarding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98637 - 2013-06-24
State v. Gary R. Malkmus
. Gary R. Malkmus appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence credit. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15141 - 2005-03-31
. Gary R. Malkmus appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence credit. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15141 - 2005-03-31
State v. Toran D. Brooks
-degree intentional homicide. Brooks claims that the trial court should have granted his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13635 - 2005-03-31
-degree intentional homicide. Brooks claims that the trial court should have granted his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13635 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
).1 Fenton argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his suppression motion. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
).1 Fenton argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his suppression motion. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
Paul A. Weasler v. Weasler Engineering, Inc.
denying its motion to disqualify the law firm of Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren, Norris & Rieselbach, S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13161 - 2005-03-31
denying its motion to disqualify the law firm of Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren, Norris & Rieselbach, S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13161 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief. Hogenson argues his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14
his motion for postconviction relief. Hogenson argues his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. City of Milwaukee
did not file a notice of claim with the City. The City brought a motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8663 - 2017-09-19
did not file a notice of claim with the City. The City brought a motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8663 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the postconviction motion that Bornes filed on his own behalf shortly after postconviction counsel was appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830235 - 2024-07-23
to the postconviction motion that Bornes filed on his own behalf shortly after postconviction counsel was appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830235 - 2024-07-23
Badger Contracting, Inc. v. John Harwood
discuss the appeal, then the cross-appeal, and finally, the Harwoods’ motion for costs for frivolousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15315 - 2005-03-31
discuss the appeal, then the cross-appeal, and finally, the Harwoods’ motion for costs for frivolousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15315 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger W. Hubbard
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm both the judgment and the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14523 - 2005-03-31
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm both the judgment and the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14523 - 2005-03-31