Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31041 - 31050 of 62297 for child support.
Search results 31041 - 31050 of 62297 for child support.
State v. Anthony I. Santana
argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6522 - 2012-10-10
argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6522 - 2012-10-10
[PDF]
State v. Guy S. Ruppenthal
the supporting testimony of the medical technician who withdrew the blood. Ruppenthal further argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14215 - 2014-09-15
the supporting testimony of the medical technician who withdrew the blood. Ruppenthal further argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14215 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael R.T.
bus.[1] Michael contends the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of disorderly conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14335 - 2005-03-31
bus.[1] Michael contends the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of disorderly conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14335 - 2005-03-31
David A. Clark v. Gary R. McCaughtry
in circuit court. The circuit court concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14507 - 2005-03-31
in circuit court. The circuit court concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14507 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. Cynthia J. Vernon
decision, arguing that regardless of the evidence which supported the PAC conviction, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16113 - 2005-03-31
decision, arguing that regardless of the evidence which supported the PAC conviction, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16113 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was no transcript of any testimony provided in support of the warrant; and therefore, no basis to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33011 - 2008-06-11
that there was no transcript of any testimony provided in support of the warrant; and therefore, no basis to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33011 - 2008-06-11
[PDF]
State v. Anthony I. Santana
that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for attempted first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6522 - 2017-09-19
that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for attempted first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6522 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the Declaration’s definition of “unit” applies to unconstructed units. This reading is supported by case law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186260 - 2017-09-21
, the Declaration’s definition of “unit” applies to unconstructed units. This reading is supported by case law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186260 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Corrine L. Brazee
that Morrissey was an unpublished decision, but observes that an unpublished opinion may be cited to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4086 - 2017-09-20
that Morrissey was an unpublished decision, but observes that an unpublished opinion may be cited to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4086 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
evidence in the record to support his contention that he had an ownership interest in the property for any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115308 - 2014-06-19
evidence in the record to support his contention that he had an ownership interest in the property for any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115308 - 2014-06-19