Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31041 - 31050 of 39848 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 31041 - 31050 of 39848 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
Patricia H.S. v. Richard Lee R.
hearing arguments on the motion and Richard's statements, the court granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11229 - 2017-09-19
hearing arguments on the motion and Richard's statements, the court granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11229 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Xavier R. Neave
statement that this addition to the statute was designed to limit the Ferguson holding. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13324 - 2017-09-21
statement that this addition to the statute was designed to limit the Ferguson holding. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13324 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statement that it had “considered all such record documentation and evidence,” the court appears to have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
statement that it had “considered all such record documentation and evidence,” the court appears to have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Gorden V. Pemrich
predator, in part from the statements he had made about the incidents, but also from Pemrich's acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9597 - 2017-09-19
predator, in part from the statements he had made about the incidents, but also from Pemrich's acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9597 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with WIS. STAT. § 48.422(3) and bases its decision solely on the no contest colloquy and the statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210220 - 2018-03-27
with WIS. STAT. § 48.422(3) and bases its decision solely on the no contest colloquy and the statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210220 - 2018-03-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
this constituted an erroneous exercise of discretion in several ways. To begin with, the court’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37031 - 2014-09-15
this constituted an erroneous exercise of discretion in several ways. To begin with, the court’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37031 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tito Quixte Grimes
McCleary v. State, 49 Wis.2d 263, 282, 182 N.W.2d 512, 522 (1971) (if trial court sentencing statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10539 - 2005-03-31
McCleary v. State, 49 Wis.2d 263, 282, 182 N.W.2d 512, 522 (1971) (if trial court sentencing statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10539 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
responded in the affirmative. Before the victim’s family members made their statements at the combined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79523 - 2014-09-15
responded in the affirmative. Before the victim’s family members made their statements at the combined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79523 - 2014-09-15
Rebecca A. Yager v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, 97 Wis.2d 408, 425, 294 N.W.2d 25, 36 (1980) (inconsistencies and contradictions in the statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14396 - 2005-03-31
, 97 Wis.2d 408, 425, 294 N.W.2d 25, 36 (1980) (inconsistencies and contradictions in the statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14396 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are clearly erroneous. While she submits an appendix identifying, for example, the neighbor’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929751 - 2025-03-19
are clearly erroneous. While she submits an appendix identifying, for example, the neighbor’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929751 - 2025-03-19