Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31041 - 31050 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
second claimed inaccuracy was the trial court’s reliance on its experience involving the effect of bypass
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28155 - 2007-02-20

COURT OF APPEALS
to these consolidated appeals. For purposes of Ramage’s claim for sentence credit, the facts comprising those histories
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90409 - 2012-12-10

COURT OF APPEALS
and the trial. We agree with the trial court’s rejection of these claims, so we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132255 - 2014-12-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
returned verdicts in favor of Phyllis on liability as to both the claim and counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82292 - 2014-09-15

State v. Joseph A. Diaz
denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. Diaz claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20086 - 2007-06-04

State v. Carl R. Kramer
The essential facts concerning Kramer’s selective prosecution claim are undisputed. Kramer owned and operated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31

Karen Sann v. Badger Care-A-Vans, Inc.
employment. ¶4 Sann filed a claim for worker’s compensation benefits and, after a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4371 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. It also claims there was no continuing contempt warranting remedial sanctions and that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126143 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with the State’s discovery demand. Jones claims his counsel was ineffective for not providing notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118321 - 2014-09-15

M. Susan Churchill v. WFA Econometrics Corporation
a decision and a judgment declaring that there was no insurance coverage for the defamation claim under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4916 - 2005-03-31