Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31041 - 31050 of 42994 for t o.
Search results 31041 - 31050 of 42994 for t o.
[PDF]
State v. James Buckett
particularly, the trial court can consider the following: [T]he vicious or aggravated nature of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8020 - 2017-09-19
particularly, the trial court can consider the following: [T]he vicious or aggravated nature of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8020 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the officer testified that, after his squad car pulled behind Restad’s vehicle at a stoplight, “[T]he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992751 - 2025-08-05
, the officer testified that, after his squad car pulled behind Restad’s vehicle at a stoplight, “[T]he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992751 - 2025-08-05
John L. Burns v. Douglas M. Scheel
and not a prescriptive easement was shown. We conclude that Ludke does not control. In Ludke, "[t]he trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11789 - 2005-03-31
and not a prescriptive easement was shown. We conclude that Ludke does not control. In Ludke, "[t]he trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11789 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
was revoked, his ‘resentencing’ had not yet occurred….[I]t was the intent of the trial court to sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28231 - 2007-02-26
was revoked, his ‘resentencing’ had not yet occurred….[I]t was the intent of the trial court to sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28231 - 2007-02-26
State v. Carlos Z.T.
summarized the circumstances leading to the seizure of his marijuana and to the custodial interrogation: [T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14628 - 2005-03-31
summarized the circumstances leading to the seizure of his marijuana and to the custodial interrogation: [T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14628 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
262, the court explained why it deviated upward from the E.S. recommendations: “[T]he only way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139077 - 2015-04-07
262, the court explained why it deviated upward from the E.S. recommendations: “[T]he only way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139077 - 2015-04-07
State v. Wilfredo Melo
or money.”[1] As a result, he believed “[t]hat Mr. Melo was involved in narcotics trafficking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11060 - 2005-03-31
or money.”[1] As a result, he believed “[t]hat Mr. Melo was involved in narcotics trafficking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11060 - 2005-03-31
Larry J. Bauer v. Merlin R. Carothers
that “the majority of the evidence at [t]rial focused on the rotator cuff,” although he also suffered pain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4803 - 2005-03-31
that “the majority of the evidence at [t]rial focused on the rotator cuff,” although he also suffered pain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4803 - 2005-03-31
WI App 7 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP62 Complete Title of Ca...
Wis. 2d 74, 729 N.W.2d 415. DISCUSSION ¶7 “[T]he State cannot be sued without its consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90425 - 2013-01-29
Wis. 2d 74, 729 N.W.2d 415. DISCUSSION ¶7 “[T]he State cannot be sued without its consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90425 - 2013-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
, nevertheless determined that four days of secure detention was necessary. It stated: [T]he court recalls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48538 - 2010-03-30
, nevertheless determined that four days of secure detention was necessary. It stated: [T]he court recalls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48538 - 2010-03-30