Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31051 - 31060 of 62305 for child support.
Search results 31051 - 31060 of 62305 for child support.
Gator Garb, Inc. v. Kay E. Tanner
, an independent entity from either Tanner or Stark.[1] The record does not support a conclusion that the money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2683 - 2005-03-31
, an independent entity from either Tanner or Stark.[1] The record does not support a conclusion that the money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2683 - 2005-03-31
State v. Abel Silva
each claim in favor of supporting the order, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7980 - 2005-03-31
each claim in favor of supporting the order, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7980 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to present sufficient evidence to support the convictions. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34499 - 2008-11-03
to present sufficient evidence to support the convictions. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34499 - 2008-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was no transcript of any testimony provided in support of the warrant; and therefore, no basis to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33011 - 2008-06-11
that there was no transcript of any testimony provided in support of the warrant; and therefore, no basis to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33011 - 2008-06-11
CA Blank Order
if there are facts in the record which would support the trial court’s decision had it fully exercised its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143682 - 2015-06-30
if there are facts in the record which would support the trial court’s decision had it fully exercised its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143682 - 2015-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
argues: (1) the State presented insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that Bearhart drove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141760 - 2015-05-13
argues: (1) the State presented insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that Bearhart drove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141760 - 2015-05-13
[PDF]
State v. Guy S. Ruppenthal
the supporting testimony of the medical technician who withdrew the blood. Ruppenthal further argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14215 - 2014-09-15
the supporting testimony of the medical technician who withdrew the blood. Ruppenthal further argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14215 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 102.23(6). As long as the factual findings are supported by credible and substantial evidence, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31867 - 2008-02-18
. § 102.23(6). As long as the factual findings are supported by credible and substantial evidence, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31867 - 2008-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
property [it] ha[s] legal authority over.” The circuit court further rejected, as not supported by any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59675 - 2011-02-07
property [it] ha[s] legal authority over.” The circuit court further rejected, as not supported by any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59675 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
4 brief, Jaworski contends that “the transcript is wrong and that is a fact.” The only support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470419 - 2022-01-11
4 brief, Jaworski contends that “the transcript is wrong and that is a fact.” The only support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470419 - 2022-01-11