Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31051 - 31060 of 62304 for child support.
Search results 31051 - 31060 of 62304 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of facts are upheld unless clearly erroneous and not supported by the record. See Gerth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77700 - 2012-08-09
court’s findings of facts are upheld unless clearly erroneous and not supported by the record. See Gerth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77700 - 2012-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was no transcript of any testimony provided in support of the warrant; and therefore, no basis to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33011 - 2008-06-11
that there was no transcript of any testimony provided in support of the warrant; and therefore, no basis to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33011 - 2008-06-11
CA Blank Order
if there are facts in the record which would support the trial court’s decision had it fully exercised its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143682 - 2015-06-30
if there are facts in the record which would support the trial court’s decision had it fully exercised its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143682 - 2015-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
argues: (1) the State presented insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that Bearhart drove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141760 - 2015-05-13
argues: (1) the State presented insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that Bearhart drove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141760 - 2015-05-13
[PDF]
State v. Guy S. Ruppenthal
the supporting testimony of the medical technician who withdrew the blood. Ruppenthal further argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14215 - 2014-09-15
the supporting testimony of the medical technician who withdrew the blood. Ruppenthal further argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14215 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James G. Geiger
No. 03-3043 2 motions. Geiger challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7039 - 2017-09-20
No. 03-3043 2 motions. Geiger challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7039 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶6 McAnallen contends the affidavit in support of the search warrant was insufficient because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53539 - 2014-09-15
¶6 McAnallen contends the affidavit in support of the search warrant was insufficient because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53539 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark Anthony Mitchell
juror’s bias is “manifest.” If the record either: “(1) does not support a finding that No. 98-0992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13848 - 2014-09-15
juror’s bias is “manifest.” If the record either: “(1) does not support a finding that No. 98-0992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13848 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supported the pleas. It advised him it was not bound by any recommendations and could impose the maximum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180107 - 2017-09-21
supported the pleas. It advised him it was not bound by any recommendations and could impose the maximum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180107 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
else was in the residence to support the subsequent search under either the community caretaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117797 - 2017-09-21
else was in the residence to support the subsequent search under either the community caretaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117797 - 2017-09-21