Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31061 - 31070 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 31061 - 31070 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.
Kevin Kirsch v. Pat Siedschlag
there is a meritorious defense to the claim; and (5) whether there are intervening circumstances making it inequitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10414 - 2005-03-31
there is a meritorious defense to the claim; and (5) whether there are intervening circumstances making it inequitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10414 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 23
and Great Lakes filed a Subcontractor Claim for Lien on Riverworks in the amount of $188,790, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348435 - 2021-05-10
and Great Lakes filed a Subcontractor Claim for Lien on Riverworks in the amount of $188,790, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348435 - 2021-05-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), a claim of newly discovered evidence, and in the interest of justice). 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391962 - 2021-07-21
. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), a claim of newly discovered evidence, and in the interest of justice). 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391962 - 2021-07-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
addresses whether there would be any arguable merit to a claim that the evidence was insufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195401 - 2017-09-21
addresses whether there would be any arguable merit to a claim that the evidence was insufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195401 - 2017-09-21
State v. James F. Blasky
) and 939.647[1] (2001-02).[2] He claims the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6642 - 2005-03-31
) and 939.647[1] (2001-02).[2] He claims the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6642 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, possession, or transportation” when claiming this footnote supports his position. No. 2016AP173-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180495 - 2017-09-21
, possession, or transportation” when claiming this footnote supports his position. No. 2016AP173-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180495 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a postconviction motion, alleging a new factor. Specifically, he claimed that his “treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732531 - 2023-11-29
filed a postconviction motion, alleging a new factor. Specifically, he claimed that his “treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732531 - 2023-11-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in a case against me, in my absence.” He stated, “I have no idea what this claim is about,” and “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382494 - 2021-06-29
in a case against me, in my absence.” He stated, “I have no idea what this claim is about,” and “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382494 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with a misunderstanding of the value of his plea bargain. Alternatively, Hand claimed that trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449284 - 2021-11-10
with a misunderstanding of the value of his plea bargain. Alternatively, Hand claimed that trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449284 - 2021-11-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. There is no arguable merit to a claim that Griffin’s pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. The other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237309 - 2019-03-11
. There is no arguable merit to a claim that Griffin’s pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. The other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237309 - 2019-03-11