Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31061 - 31070 of 63198 for records.
Search results 31061 - 31070 of 63198 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Copus
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
was ineffective for not raising several issues. Id. After an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28957 - 2014-09-15
was ineffective for not raising several issues. Id. After an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28957 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of discretion argument in relation to the fine. We will affirm if the record establishes that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212294 - 2018-05-09
of discretion argument in relation to the fine. We will affirm if the record establishes that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212294 - 2018-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and independently reviewing the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245252 - 2019-08-21
and independently reviewing the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245252 - 2019-08-21
[PDF]
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
not challenge this history. Instead, he appears to be arguing that he had no prior convictions on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25003 - 2017-09-21
not challenge this history. Instead, he appears to be arguing that he had no prior convictions on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25003 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of justice. After review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
of justice. After review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Saffold could raise on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214069 - 2018-06-07
of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Saffold could raise on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214069 - 2018-06-07
[PDF]
State v. James F. Emerich
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2359 - 2017-09-19
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2359 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15
State v. James R. Donohoo
performance of the forbidden conduct to others.”). We have reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8563 - 2005-03-31
performance of the forbidden conduct to others.”). We have reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8563 - 2005-03-31