Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31061 - 31070 of 82372 for simple case.
Search results 31061 - 31070 of 82372 for simple case.
State v. Charles V. Royster
to $2,500 does [not] make the amount of money involved in a particular case irrelevant or preclude the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
to $2,500 does [not] make the amount of money involved in a particular case irrelevant or preclude the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
to affirm the circuit court in this case. No. 2008AP696 3 ¶4 The County relies primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34375 - 2014-09-15
to affirm the circuit court in this case. No. 2008AP696 3 ¶4 The County relies primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34375 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and circumstances in this case bearing upon knowledge or belief.” See WIS JI— CRIMINAL 6030. ¶12 Having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341489 - 2021-03-04
and circumstances in this case bearing upon knowledge or belief.” See WIS JI— CRIMINAL 6030. ¶12 Having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341489 - 2021-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
a prima facie case that the circuit court failed to fulfill its mandatory duties during the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136995 - 2015-03-09
a prima facie case that the circuit court failed to fulfill its mandatory duties during the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136995 - 2015-03-09
State v. Julius M. Covington
. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 690 (1984). In this case, we agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25086 - 2006-05-08
. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 690 (1984). In this case, we agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25086 - 2006-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
was not an exact quotation of this case law, the City does not explain precisely what legal difference it believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33186 - 2008-06-25
was not an exact quotation of this case law, the City does not explain precisely what legal difference it believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33186 - 2008-06-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947819 - 2025-04-30
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947819 - 2025-04-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
Wis. 2d 541, 550, 525 N.W.2d 723 (1995) (citing DePratt, 113 Wis. 2d at 311). In the present case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45687 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d 541, 550, 525 N.W.2d 723 (1995) (citing DePratt, 113 Wis. 2d at 311). In the present case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45687 - 2014-09-15