Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31071 - 31080 of 63609 for records/1000.
Search results 31071 - 31080 of 63609 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the marriage. Ronald claims the court failed to base its decision on facts in the record and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31791 - 2008-02-11
to the marriage. Ronald claims the court failed to base its decision on facts in the record and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31791 - 2008-02-11
State v. Quentin L. Rogers
was insufficient because “[t]he record contains no evidence of a threat of ‘imminent use of force,’ or that Jakober
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14655 - 2005-03-31
was insufficient because “[t]he record contains no evidence of a threat of ‘imminent use of force,’ or that Jakober
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14655 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an examination of the record shows that the finding is supported by the record and is not clearly erroneous. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82387 - 2012-05-15
an examination of the record shows that the finding is supported by the record and is not clearly erroneous. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82387 - 2012-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
court’s discretionary decisions, we may independently search the record to uphold its ruling.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27493 - 2006-12-18
court’s discretionary decisions, we may independently search the record to uphold its ruling.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27493 - 2006-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.17(1) (2011-12). 1 Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm. In 2011
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105738 - 2017-09-21
. RULE 809.17(1) (2011-12). 1 Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm. In 2011
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105738 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglas Royster
, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the trial court ever relied on Durfee’s statements in sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9122 - 2005-03-31
, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the trial court ever relied on Durfee’s statements in sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9122 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. “Chapter 30 Exemption Determination Request” document, which is in the record. The document applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86804 - 2014-09-15
. “Chapter 30 Exemption Determination Request” document, which is in the record. The document applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86804 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665124 - 2023-06-07
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665124 - 2023-06-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
failed to base its decision on facts in the record and failed to consider statutory factors. Ronald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31791 - 2014-09-15
failed to base its decision on facts in the record and failed to consider statutory factors. Ronald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31791 - 2014-09-15
Delmar F. Renak v. Raymond G. Feest
to the freehold? The Court can only conclude based on the record before it that the answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18876 - 2005-07-05
to the freehold? The Court can only conclude based on the record before it that the answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18876 - 2005-07-05