Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31091 - 31100 of 83510 for case code.
Search results 31091 - 31100 of 83510 for case code.
Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
. He claims, however, that this case is different from Wettstaedt. He states that in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7565 - 2005-03-31
. He claims, however, that this case is different from Wettstaedt. He states that in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7565 - 2005-03-31
State v. Herbert Ascher
specified the difficulties it foresaw in taking the case to trial and indicated that, in return for Ascher’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2263 - 2005-03-31
specified the difficulties it foresaw in taking the case to trial and indicated that, in return for Ascher’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2263 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9086 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9086 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8098 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8098 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ordered by the circuit court, and accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602575 - 2023-01-10
ordered by the circuit court, and accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602575 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
State v. Bruce E. Black
2000 WI App 175 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15690 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI App 175 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15690 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case is whether the circuit court in Juneau County erred in ordering a change in his “county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86169 - 2012-08-15
in this case is whether the circuit court in Juneau County erred in ordering a change in his “county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86169 - 2012-08-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court said, “I need to make sure you understand that you do have the right, in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102094 - 2026-04-09
, the court said, “I need to make sure you understand that you do have the right, in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102094 - 2026-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
carry less weight than the original judgment in this case. In no way was it based on a “well-informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29790 - 2007-07-23
carry less weight than the original judgment in this case. In no way was it based on a “well-informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29790 - 2007-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
of harassment at his home due to the prior case, as well as job losses. Hicks stated that, based on his prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2012-12-10
of harassment at his home due to the prior case, as well as job losses. Hicks stated that, based on his prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2012-12-10