Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3111 - 3120 of 15288 for 2013.
Search results 3111 - 3120 of 15288 for 2013.
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144185 - 2015-07-14
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144185 - 2015-07-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
thirteen (sexual contact) contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e) (2013-14). 1 Cornell’s appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143763 - 2017-09-21
thirteen (sexual contact) contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e) (2013-14). 1 Cornell’s appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143763 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159817 - 2017-09-21
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159817 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and as a repeater. Conroy’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138594 - 2015-03-31
and as a repeater. Conroy’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138594 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168405 - 2017-09-21
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168405 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We agree that the motion is procedurally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153945 - 2017-09-21
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We agree that the motion is procedurally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153945 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171648 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171648 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152264 - 2017-09-21
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in October 2013. Prior to January 1, 2014, imposition of a $250 DNA surcharge was discretionary for most
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195127 - 2017-09-21
in October 2013. Prior to January 1, 2014, imposition of a $250 DNA surcharge was discretionary for most
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195127 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court gave the deportation warning required by WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(c) (2013-14). 1 Houston
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171603 - 2017-09-21
. The court gave the deportation warning required by WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(c) (2013-14). 1 Houston
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171603 - 2017-09-21