Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3111 - 3120 of 11912 for affidavit.
Search results 3111 - 3120 of 11912 for affidavit.
State v. Eugene Keeler
hearing was not supported by an affidavit regarding the facts surrounding the jury tampering allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8070 - 2005-03-31
hearing was not supported by an affidavit regarding the facts surrounding the jury tampering allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wisconsin Department ofCorrections v. Richard E. Artison
was supported by two affidavits alleging in detail the dangerous and overcrowded conditions at Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9094 - 2017-09-19
was supported by two affidavits alleging in detail the dangerous and overcrowded conditions at Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9094 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
five months later, on August 15, 2018, and states: “affidavit of service.” Six months after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=895058 - 2024-12-23
five months later, on August 15, 2018, and states: “affidavit of service.” Six months after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=895058 - 2024-12-23
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
under Wis. Stat. § 48.415(4). The County alleged in the supporting affidavit that the reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31
under Wis. Stat. § 48.415(4). The County alleged in the supporting affidavit that the reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
and affidavits in support of their summary judgment motions. The St. Luke's defendants adopted the brief filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9076 - 2017-09-19
and affidavits in support of their summary judgment motions. The St. Luke's defendants adopted the brief filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9076 - 2017-09-19
State v. Raymond F. Gose
was affirmed on appeal. Id. at 6. ¶3 In April 2002, the victim filed an affidavit recanting her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6989 - 2005-03-31
was affirmed on appeal. Id. at 6. ¶3 In April 2002, the victim filed an affidavit recanting her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6989 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30603 - 2007-10-15
party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30603 - 2007-10-15
[PDF]
Thomas V. Rankin, M.D. v. Medical Examining Board
that the signature he affixed is attached to his affidavit.” The affidavit provided: I, the above-named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4850 - 2017-09-19
that the signature he affixed is attached to his affidavit.” The affidavit provided: I, the above-named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4850 - 2017-09-19
Ramiro Estrada v. State
or that counsel adopted the videotape as his own work product. Tammy’s affidavit states only that the attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31
or that counsel adopted the videotape as his own work product. Tammy’s affidavit states only that the attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was invalid. Jackson maintained that the affidavit used to obtain the provision contained a false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251812 - 2020-01-02
was invalid. Jackson maintained that the affidavit used to obtain the provision contained a false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251812 - 2020-01-02