Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3111 - 3120 of 24970 for extending.
Search results 3111 - 3120 of 24970 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement followed by three years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078680 - 2026-02-17
of initial confinement followed by three years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078680 - 2026-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
his sentence of twenty years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34314 - 2008-10-14
his sentence of twenty years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34314 - 2008-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement, to be followed by four years of extended supervision, to be served consecutively. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
confinement, to be followed by four years of extended supervision, to be served consecutively. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
the duration of extended supervision to the trial court’s discretion.[2] The trial court imposed a fifteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33911 - 2008-09-02
the duration of extended supervision to the trial court’s discretion.[2] The trial court imposed a fifteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33911 - 2008-09-02
State v. Daniel E.
that the termination order is invalid because he was not properly notified of a request to extend a CHIPS[1] order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16063 - 2005-03-31
that the termination order is invalid because he was not properly notified of a request to extend a CHIPS[1] order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16063 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the State for an aggregate sentence of three years of initial confinement and three years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245274 - 2019-08-14
with the State for an aggregate sentence of three years of initial confinement and three years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245274 - 2019-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
of imprisonment, “broken down to potentially forty years confinement time and ten years extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29782 - 2007-07-23
of imprisonment, “broken down to potentially forty years confinement time and ten years extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29782 - 2007-07-23
CA Blank Order
agreed to recommend a global sentence of ten years of initial confinement and eight years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132312 - 2014-12-25
agreed to recommend a global sentence of ten years of initial confinement and eight years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132312 - 2014-12-25
COURT OF APPEALS
in case No. 2010CF5855, is thirty months’ initial confinement and thirty-six months’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101937 - 2013-09-16
in case No. 2010CF5855, is thirty months’ initial confinement and thirty-six months’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101937 - 2013-09-16
State v. Jared J.
only three and one-half months remained on the dispositional order and determined that it could extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31
only three and one-half months remained on the dispositional order and determined that it could extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31