Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3111 - 3120 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 3111 - 3120 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
Thomas Norman v. Ruby Faulkner
Faulkner, which stated that he was the owner in fee simple of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11400 - 2005-03-31
Faulkner, which stated that he was the owner in fee simple of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11400 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
possession, which in this case require “hostile, open and notorious, exclusive and continuous” physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145389 - 2015-07-30
possession, which in this case require “hostile, open and notorious, exclusive and continuous” physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145389 - 2015-07-30
State v. Craig A. Zempel
that “may not be considered in assessing the existence of probable cause.” Zempel cites several cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31
that “may not be considered in assessing the existence of probable cause.” Zempel cites several cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] However, we will exercise our discretionary reversal power “only in exceptional cases.” State v. Cuyler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93425 - 2013-02-27
] However, we will exercise our discretionary reversal power “only in exceptional cases.” State v. Cuyler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93425 - 2013-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
simple proposition: one may not be punished for the exercise of a protected right.’” State v. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139970 - 2017-09-21
simple proposition: one may not be punished for the exercise of a protected right.’” State v. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 893.25 1 codifies the common law elements of adverse possession, which in this case require “hostile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145389 - 2017-09-21
. § 893.25 1 codifies the common law elements of adverse possession, which in this case require “hostile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145389 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas Norman v. Ruby Faulkner
Faulkner, which stated that he was the owner in fee simple of the property. Faulkner initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11400 - 2017-09-19
Faulkner, which stated that he was the owner in fee simple of the property. Faulkner initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11400 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this is an “analog” case. As we now explain, it is not. ¶11 Both of the crimes at issue on appeal may be proven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239253 - 2019-04-18
that this is an “analog” case. As we now explain, it is not. ¶11 Both of the crimes at issue on appeal may be proven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239253 - 2019-04-18
[PDF]
State v. Timothy Taylor
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10594 - 2017-09-20
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10594 - 2017-09-20
State v. Timothy Taylor
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10594 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10594 - 2005-03-31