Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31101 - 31110 of 62360 for child support.
Search results 31101 - 31110 of 62360 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of facts are upheld unless clearly erroneous and not supported by the record. See Gerth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77700 - 2012-02-07
court’s findings of facts are upheld unless clearly erroneous and not supported by the record. See Gerth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77700 - 2012-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals a circuit court order suppressing evidence supporting a charge of possession of drug paraphernalia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57078 - 2010-11-23
appeals a circuit court order suppressing evidence supporting a charge of possession of drug paraphernalia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57078 - 2010-11-23
State v. Mark Anthony Mitchell
not support a finding that the prospective juror is a reasonable person who is sincerely willing to put aside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13848 - 2005-03-31
not support a finding that the prospective juror is a reasonable person who is sincerely willing to put aside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13848 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Wolfe
, 270. ¶7 Our supreme court concluded that the near maximum sentence was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19696 - 2005-03-31
, 270. ¶7 Our supreme court concluded that the near maximum sentence was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19696 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
evidence in the record to support his contention that he had an ownership interest in the property for any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115301 - 2005-03-31
evidence in the record to support his contention that he had an ownership interest in the property for any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115301 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. He argues the evidence was insufficient to support a determination that he was “dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81880 - 2012-04-30
relief. He argues the evidence was insufficient to support a determination that he was “dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81880 - 2012-04-30
Mack J. Holt, Jr. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh
playing basketball.[1] The YMCA argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12692 - 2008-09-15
playing basketball.[1] The YMCA argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12692 - 2008-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
not reflect a sufficient exercise of discretion to support the surcharge. Accordingly, we reverse the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32344 - 2008-05-27
not reflect a sufficient exercise of discretion to support the surcharge. Accordingly, we reverse the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32344 - 2008-05-27
State v. Patrick T. Glover
denied Glover’s motion to suppress, finding that reasonable suspicion supported the stop and probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20709 - 2005-12-20
denied Glover’s motion to suppress, finding that reasonable suspicion supported the stop and probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20709 - 2005-12-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there is no arguable merit to challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the verdicts. Appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675084 - 2023-07-05
that there is no arguable merit to challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the verdicts. Appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675084 - 2023-07-05