Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31101 - 31110 of 82874 for simple case search.
Search results 31101 - 31110 of 82874 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Delbert L. Manke
his request for copies of transcripts and other documents pertaining to his criminal cases under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9398 - 2017-09-19
his request for copies of transcripts and other documents pertaining to his criminal cases under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9398 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231239 - 2018-12-26
we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231239 - 2018-12-26
CA Blank Order
. The court proceeded to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144577 - 2015-07-30
. The court proceeded to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144577 - 2015-07-30
[PDF]
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
, in violation of § 940.19(1), STATS., to which he pleaded guilty. That case, however, is not documented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13384 - 2017-09-21
, in violation of § 940.19(1), STATS., to which he pleaded guilty. That case, however, is not documented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13384 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6482 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6482 - 2005-03-31
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6483 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6483 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
beneficiary, one by Jeanine and one by Farmer’s Insurance. The two cases were consolidated. Jeanine moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31184 - 2007-12-17
beneficiary, one by Jeanine and one by Farmer’s Insurance. The two cases were consolidated. Jeanine moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31184 - 2007-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
(collectively “Zimmerman”) appeal an order regarding an award of attorney fees in a “lemon law” case. Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
(collectively “Zimmerman”) appeal an order regarding an award of attorney fees in a “lemon law” case. Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
Oskar B. McMillian v. Terry L. Landwehr
, we affirm. BACKGROUND This case has an exceedingly complicated procedural history. We will discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13449 - 2005-03-31
, we affirm. BACKGROUND This case has an exceedingly complicated procedural history. We will discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13449 - 2005-03-31