Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31121 - 31130 of 64663 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 31121 - 31130 of 64663 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for initiating an appeal from the judgment commences when the court denies the motion on the record or when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235606 - 2019-02-27
for initiating an appeal from the judgment commences when the court denies the motion on the record or when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235606 - 2019-02-27
CA Blank Order
addressing additional issues. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92741 - 2013-02-11
addressing additional issues. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92741 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473291 - 2022-01-19
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473291 - 2022-01-19
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Mack
. In sentencing Mack, the trial court considered Mack’s character, his extensive record as a juvenile and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13112 - 2017-09-21
. In sentencing Mack, the trial court considered Mack’s character, his extensive record as a juvenile and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13112 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592511 - 2022-11-22
so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592511 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
on proof of a conviction which was not of record in 1995. We clarify as follows. Because a new hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27129 - 2014-09-15
on proof of a conviction which was not of record in 1995. We clarify as follows. Because a new hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27129 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude this case is appropriate for summary disposition and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100727 - 2017-09-21
review of the briefs and record, we conclude this case is appropriate for summary disposition and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100727 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. (Whereupon discussion was had off the record between the defendant and counsel.) THE COURT: We’re back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40991 - 2009-09-21
. (Whereupon discussion was had off the record between the defendant and counsel.) THE COURT: We’re back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40991 - 2009-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Darren Johnson-Hayes
by the district attorney I accept as being reflective of the record that was created.” However, based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15763 - 2017-09-21
by the district attorney I accept as being reflective of the record that was created.” However, based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15763 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because a different factfinder could draw opposing inferences from the record. Appellate courts search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195010 - 2017-09-21
because a different factfinder could draw opposing inferences from the record. Appellate courts search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195010 - 2017-09-21