Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31121 - 31130 of 40050 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 31121 - 31130 of 40050 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress custodial statements, the validity of Rice’s guilty plea, and the circuit court’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35203 - 2009-01-12
to suppress custodial statements, the validity of Rice’s guilty plea, and the circuit court’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35203 - 2009-01-12
[PDF]
State v. Lee Crouthers
, and that such generalized statements could support any sentence from the minimum to the maximum. In addition, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15534 - 2017-09-21
, and that such generalized statements could support any sentence from the minimum to the maximum. In addition, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15534 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
implied consent law, “[o]fficers seeking to conduct a BAC test must read aloud a statement declaring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465853 - 2021-12-21
implied consent law, “[o]fficers seeking to conduct a BAC test must read aloud a statement declaring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465853 - 2021-12-21
State v. Shaun T. Nichols
as a contemporaneous statement by the victim bearing on the element of consent. However, the court reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19598 - 2005-09-13
as a contemporaneous statement by the victim bearing on the element of consent. However, the court reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19598 - 2005-09-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
to obtain a statement relevant to the proceedings; and (3) refused to set terms by which Latimer could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56355 - 2014-09-15
to obtain a statement relevant to the proceedings; and (3) refused to set terms by which Latimer could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56355 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gary E. Andrashko
. The only attempted justification provided for filing another § 974.06 motion was Andrashko's statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8579 - 2005-03-31
. The only attempted justification provided for filing another § 974.06 motion was Andrashko's statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8579 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and statements of purpose regarding the reason and use of the information about an applicant’s criminal history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50274 - 2010-05-24
and statements of purpose regarding the reason and use of the information about an applicant’s criminal history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50274 - 2010-05-24
Roberta L. Brunell v. Miljevich Corporation
are essentially not disputed, we largely rely on the briefs for the factual statement. See Charolais Breeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14308 - 2005-03-31
are essentially not disputed, we largely rely on the briefs for the factual statement. See Charolais Breeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14308 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
an No. 2006AP1899 6 occupational disease. General Motors relies on a statement that “the evidence does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30004 - 2014-09-15
an No. 2006AP1899 6 occupational disease. General Motors relies on a statement that “the evidence does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30004 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
decision to exercise his right to testify, opening statements, and closing arguments— does not disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971667 - 2025-06-18
decision to exercise his right to testify, opening statements, and closing arguments— does not disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971667 - 2025-06-18