Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31131 - 31140 of 46081 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 31131 - 31140 of 46081 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to test the legality of his or her detention. Additionally, in a postconviction setting, a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98825 - 2014-09-15
to test the legality of his or her detention. Additionally, in a postconviction setting, a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98825 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John G. Anderson
a preliminary breath test showed that Anderson had been drinking in violation of his probation, he became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16301 - 2017-09-21
a preliminary breath test showed that Anderson had been drinking in violation of his probation, he became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16301 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald Boeshaar
the prejudice test, Boeshaar must show that, but for defense counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12310 - 2017-09-21
the prejudice test, Boeshaar must show that, but for defense counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gregory Hoppe
by applying the totality of the circumstances test. [T]he task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12716 - 2017-09-21
by applying the totality of the circumstances test. [T]he task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12716 - 2017-09-21
Andre Wingo v. Randall R. Hepp
by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his or her detention.”
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21139 - 2006-01-30
by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his or her detention.”
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21139 - 2006-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
conceptualized as a one- or two-part test because the bottom line under either formulation is that prejudice must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33011 - 2008-06-11
conceptualized as a one- or two-part test because the bottom line under either formulation is that prejudice must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33011 - 2008-06-11
State v. Lionel C. Whitehead
a two-part test when determining whether pretrial identification evidence is admissible. See Marshall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5827 - 2005-03-31
a two-part test when determining whether pretrial identification evidence is admissible. See Marshall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5827 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.’” Id. (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 21). Objective and common sense tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.’” Id. (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 21). Objective and common sense tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 56. What constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. Id. We look to what a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30099 - 2007-08-27
. at 56. What constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. Id. We look to what a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30099 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
State v. John D. Bobbitt, Jr.
: The test is not whether this court is convinced of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8400 - 2017-09-19
: The test is not whether this court is convinced of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8400 - 2017-09-19