Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31131 - 31140 of 83433 for simple case search.
Search results 31131 - 31140 of 83433 for simple case search.
State v. Richard J. Wooster
980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B. Sentencing Discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B. Sentencing Discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
Sherry Mulligan v. Barbara J. Koehler
appealed the September 28, 1994, judgment to this court in case number 94-2532. Ultimately that appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10417 - 2005-03-31
appealed the September 28, 1994, judgment to this court in case number 94-2532. Ultimately that appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10417 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Blodgett
. An Intoxilyzer test subsequently revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. Blodgett tried his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12416 - 2017-09-21
. An Intoxilyzer test subsequently revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. Blodgett tried his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12416 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150617 - 2017-09-21
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150617 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Wooster
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
subject matter jurisdiction, we noted “The cases Carter cites in support of his motion reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
subject matter jurisdiction, we noted “The cases Carter cites in support of his motion reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
Timothy G. Wolff v. Roger M. Coates
commissioner heard the case on July 6, 1998, and orally granted judgment to the Wolffs in the amount of $1601
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15326 - 2005-03-31
commissioner heard the case on July 6, 1998, and orally granted judgment to the Wolffs in the amount of $1601
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15326 - 2005-03-31
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6480 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6480 - 2005-03-31
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6481 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6481 - 2005-03-31
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6482 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6482 - 2005-03-31