Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31131 - 31140 of 83289 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 31131 - 31140 of 83289 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the 2016 order.” Id., ¶14 (quoted source omitted).3 ¶7 S.A.M. seeks to distinguish this case from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284520 - 2020-09-15
to the 2016 order.” Id., ¶14 (quoted source omitted).3 ¶7 S.A.M. seeks to distinguish this case from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284520 - 2020-09-15
[PDF]
Mary L. Brice v. Roger Garfield Dale Miller, Sr.
with a relative. Brice's case manager, Bernard Kilps, testified that he has a bachelor's and master's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14587 - 2017-09-21
with a relative. Brice's case manager, Bernard Kilps, testified that he has a bachelor's and master's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14587 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
not control this case because Carter was sentenced before Gallion was decided. We hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20323 - 2014-09-15
not control this case because Carter was sentenced before Gallion was decided. We hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20323 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was not retroactively applicable to his case and, in any event, his motion was precluded. We agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36148 - 2009-04-13
was not retroactively applicable to his case and, in any event, his motion was precluded. We agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36148 - 2009-04-13
[PDF]
State v. Ronald V. McCallum
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9139 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9139 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
required to prove prosecutorial overreaching are not present in this case. We agree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233481 - 2019-01-29
required to prove prosecutorial overreaching are not present in this case. We agree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233481 - 2019-01-29
State v. Ronald V. McCallum
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9139 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9139 - 2005-03-31
Robert B. Corris v. Barton Peck
as promised, and after a series of meetings and letters, Corris moved to withdraw from the case when Peck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7425 - 2005-03-31
as promised, and after a series of meetings and letters, Corris moved to withdraw from the case when Peck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7425 - 2005-03-31
Kimberly S. S. v. Sebastian X. L.
2005 WI App 83 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 04-3219 and 04-3220
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7678 - 2005-05-09
2005 WI App 83 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 04-3219 and 04-3220
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7678 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
David M. Iushewitz v. Milwaukee County PersonnelReview Board
remand this case to the trial court for a hearing to determine the amount of Iushewitz's appeal costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8541 - 2017-09-19
remand this case to the trial court for a hearing to determine the amount of Iushewitz's appeal costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8541 - 2017-09-19