Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31141 - 31150 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 31141 - 31150 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a challenge to the circuit court’s denial of the mother’s motion to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189239 - 2017-09-21
be arguable merit to a challenge to the circuit court’s denial of the mother’s motion to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189239 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Haskell, filed a postconviction motion on Humphery’s behalf pursuant to WIS. STAT. §§ 973.155
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268585 - 2020-07-14
. Haskell, filed a postconviction motion on Humphery’s behalf pursuant to WIS. STAT. §§ 973.155
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268585 - 2020-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
appeared, by counsel, on July 5, 2006. A notice of appearance was filed, together with a motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32974 - 2008-06-09
appeared, by counsel, on July 5, 2006. A notice of appearance was filed, together with a motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32974 - 2008-06-09
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
the inherent and statutory power to dismiss a charge on its own motion or to amend the pleadings sua sponte
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4470 - 2017-09-19
the inherent and statutory power to dismiss a charge on its own motion or to amend the pleadings sua sponte
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4470 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to WIS. STAT. § 343.44(1)(b). Teasdale argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143503 - 2017-09-21
to WIS. STAT. § 343.44(1)(b). Teasdale argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143503 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 805.14(1) (“No motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence as a matter of law to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202671 - 2017-11-15
. § 805.14(1) (“No motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence as a matter of law to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202671 - 2017-11-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the circuit court that denied his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253585 - 2020-02-04
of the circuit court that denied his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253585 - 2020-02-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying her suppression motion because she believes the arresting officer lacked probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630344 - 2023-03-08
in denying her suppression motion because she believes the arresting officer lacked probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630344 - 2023-03-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
vehicle. Therefore, Vandenberg argues the circuit court should have granted his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178746 - 2017-09-21
vehicle. Therefore, Vandenberg argues the circuit court should have granted his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178746 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to consult and review her civil action.” We assume that Deprinzio is referring to a “Motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862533 - 2024-10-16
to consult and review her civil action.” We assume that Deprinzio is referring to a “Motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862533 - 2024-10-16