Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31141 - 31150 of 97641 for court records search online.
Search results 31141 - 31150 of 97641 for court records search online.
Richard E. Carter v. Audrey B. Schram
omitted. The court found that the deed was delivered to Carter; it was not, however, recorded. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11487 - 2005-03-31
omitted. The court found that the deed was delivered to Carter; it was not, however, recorded. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11487 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Richard E. Carter v. Audrey B. Schram
was delivered to Carter; it was not, however, recorded. The court concluded that the non-recording had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11487 - 2017-09-19
was delivered to Carter; it was not, however, recorded. The court concluded that the non-recording had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11487 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not be unduly burdensome for the District to review those records. The court also reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737381 - 2023-12-06
not be unduly burdensome for the District to review those records. The court also reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737381 - 2023-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not be unduly burdensome for the District to review those records. The court also reasoned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737381 - 2023-12-06
not be unduly burdensome for the District to review those records. The court also reasoned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737381 - 2023-12-06
[PDF]
WI APP 66
was inconsistent with the purpose of the open records law, we affirm the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111596 - 2017-09-21
was inconsistent with the purpose of the open records law, we affirm the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111596 - 2017-09-21
WI App 66 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1650 Complete Title of...
records law, we affirm the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 In November 2012, Ardell made a public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111596 - 2014-06-24
records law, we affirm the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 In November 2012, Ardell made a public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111596 - 2014-06-24
[PDF]
Petitioner's response to the Court's request for additional information 15-02
does not affect court reporters because it only deals with the record as created in the circuit court
/supreme/docs/1502petitionerresponse.pdf - 2015-11-03
does not affect court reporters because it only deals with the record as created in the circuit court
/supreme/docs/1502petitionerresponse.pdf - 2015-11-03
Hal Hempel v. City of Baraboo
court erred when it found that the public’s presumptive right to disclosure of investigatory records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6194 - 2005-03-31
court erred when it found that the public’s presumptive right to disclosure of investigatory records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6194 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Hal Hempel v. City of Baraboo
. Here, our inquiry is: (1) did the trial court make a factual determination supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6194 - 2017-09-19
. Here, our inquiry is: (1) did the trial court make a factual determination supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6194 - 2017-09-19
Appeal No
by the court of appeals opinion in Rock County.[3] DISCUSSION Wisconsin’s Open Records Law is codified at Wis
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26905 - 2006-10-24
by the court of appeals opinion in Rock County.[3] DISCUSSION Wisconsin’s Open Records Law is codified at Wis
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26905 - 2006-10-24