Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31141 - 31150 of 68271 for law.

COURT OF APPEALS
the use of law enforcement’s findings, only those of the department of transportation in, for example
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85907 - 2012-08-13

[PDF] County of Dane v. Daniel P. O'Connell
swerved off the road and hit a tree. ¶8 Drunk driving laws apply to “highways” and to “all premises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5869 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
objection, the victim’s videotaped statement to law enforcement was played for the jury. A computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89960 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Gerald D. Barr
are undisputed, all that remains is a question of law. GMAC Mort. Corp. v. Gisvold, 215 Wis. 2d 459, 470, 572
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6566 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." With regard to the motion for summary judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17135 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Stacey R. Wilhelm
questions of law and fact. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 698 (1984). We will not set aside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6542 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 Rolain was charged with threatening a law enforcement officer, misdemeanor battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996551 - 2025-08-14

State v. Stephen Dye
assessment involving the same drugs. This issue presents a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11836 - 2005-03-31

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Willie Quattlebaum
the defendants-appellants there was a brief by Gerald R. Harmon and Harmon Law Office, Milwaukee and oral
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17245 - 2005-03-31

Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Tammy L.W.
supports the court’s exercise of discretion and the court made no error of law, we affirm the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3590 - 2005-03-31