Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31141 - 31150 of 43341 for legal seperation.
Search results 31141 - 31150 of 43341 for legal seperation.
COURT OF APPEALS
for the offense. Wisconsin Stat. § 973.13 (2005-06) provides that a sentence in excess of the legal maximum shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33246 - 2008-06-30
for the offense. Wisconsin Stat. § 973.13 (2005-06) provides that a sentence in excess of the legal maximum shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33246 - 2008-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
-intoxicated convictions meant that the legal limit for Wetzel was .02, easily supplied probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91012 - 2012-12-26
-intoxicated convictions meant that the legal limit for Wetzel was .02, easily supplied probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91012 - 2012-12-26
State v. Eric T. Scott
a legal theory supporting the conclusion that he might be entitled to sentence credit for time he spent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17893 - 2005-05-02
a legal theory supporting the conclusion that he might be entitled to sentence credit for time he spent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17893 - 2005-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
to expound upon the legal meaning of the phrase “a natural and probable consequence,” his argument goes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30830 - 2007-11-07
to expound upon the legal meaning of the phrase “a natural and probable consequence,” his argument goes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30830 - 2007-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
case; however, the prosecutor made no mention of issue preclusion. Rather, the only legal theory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40355 - 2005-03-31
case; however, the prosecutor made no mention of issue preclusion. Rather, the only legal theory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40355 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arnold E. Lounsbury
sentence be imposed consecutive to the civil commitment and does not appeal from the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15130 - 2005-03-31
sentence be imposed consecutive to the civil commitment and does not appeal from the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15130 - 2005-03-31
State v. John A. Aschenbrener
not erroneously exercise its discretion if it examined the relevant facts, applied a proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3326 - 2005-03-31
not erroneously exercise its discretion if it examined the relevant facts, applied a proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3326 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rick E. Norem
, and had no authority to do so. This appeal followed. Legal Standards ¶13 Sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3759 - 2005-03-31
, and had no authority to do so. This appeal followed. Legal Standards ¶13 Sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3759 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven E. Benash
Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The person trying the case on behalf of the State was a legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9448 - 2005-03-31
Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The person trying the case on behalf of the State was a legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9448 - 2005-03-31
State v. David L. Kelly
, 2000 WI 92, ¶43, 236 Wis. 2d 686, 613 N.W.2d 629. A decision based on the accepted legal standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3317 - 2005-03-31
, 2000 WI 92, ¶43, 236 Wis. 2d 686, 613 N.W.2d 629. A decision based on the accepted legal standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3317 - 2005-03-31