Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31141 - 31150 of 63197 for records.
Search results 31141 - 31150 of 63197 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an evidentiary hearing on his motion challenging the search. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102847 - 2017-09-21
an evidentiary hearing on his motion challenging the search. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102847 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143850 - 2017-09-21
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143850 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record and, most importantly, our supreme court’s decision in Skindzelewski v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367598 - 2021-05-19
review of the briefs and record and, most importantly, our supreme court’s decision in Skindzelewski v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367598 - 2021-05-19
CA Blank Order
review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged three grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138273 - 2015-03-23
review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged three grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138273 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the briefs and the record, we conclude that summary disposition is appropriate. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121231 - 2014-09-15
the briefs and the record, we conclude that summary disposition is appropriate. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121231 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
found that Brophy was not indigent and entered its finding in the record the same day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61920 - 2014-09-15
found that Brophy was not indigent and entered its finding in the record the same day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61920 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Peter Bekersky
on the determination that Bekersky had not consistently asserted his innocence to counsel, and that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7779 - 2017-09-19
on the determination that Bekersky had not consistently asserted his innocence to counsel, and that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7779 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Matthew J. Zei
postconviction testimony contained no justification for that withdrawal. The record as a whole, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3293 - 2017-09-19
postconviction testimony contained no justification for that withdrawal. The record as a whole, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3293 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Thomas C. Malin v. Randel D. Knipfer
, the record indicates otherwise. The Knipfers testified that they used the easement strip for access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4139 - 2017-09-20
, the record indicates otherwise. The Knipfers testified that they used the easement strip for access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4139 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, the judgment and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240983 - 2019-05-20
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, the judgment and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240983 - 2019-05-20