Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31151 - 31160 of 57167 for id.
Search results 31151 - 31160 of 57167 for id.
CA Blank Order
imposed upon the defendant by law enforcement officers. Id., ¶38. In applying that test, we may consider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92104 - 2013-01-23
imposed upon the defendant by law enforcement officers. Id., ¶38. In applying that test, we may consider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92104 - 2013-01-23
[PDF]
State v. Christopher A. Cody
that the court exercised its discretion and stated its reasons for the sentence it imposed. See id.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15661 - 2017-09-21
that the court exercised its discretion and stated its reasons for the sentence it imposed. See id.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15661 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Rubin E. Ards
decision we will uphold its exercise of discretion. Id. at 681. The time elapsed from the event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25870 - 2017-09-21
decision we will uphold its exercise of discretion. Id. at 681. The time elapsed from the event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25870 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court’s decision.” Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813303 - 2024-06-19
was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court’s decision.” Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813303 - 2024-06-19
COURT OF APPEALS
is properly challenged by certiorari, not by mandamus. See id. Brown’s failure to raise that issue in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33389 - 2008-07-14
is properly challenged by certiorari, not by mandamus. See id. Brown’s failure to raise that issue in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33389 - 2008-07-14
State v. Jack Kinney
discretion is subject to essential demands of fairness, however. Id. We will not interfere with a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8815 - 2005-03-31
discretion is subject to essential demands of fairness, however. Id. We will not interfere with a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8815 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
to protect the public. Id. at 275-76. Further: [a] court may exceed its discretion when it places too
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19967 - 2017-09-21
to protect the public. Id. at 275-76. Further: [a] court may exceed its discretion when it places too
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19967 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Id., ¶26. Whether the court relied on inaccurate information is a question of law that we review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330955 - 2021-02-02
. Id., ¶26. Whether the court relied on inaccurate information is a question of law that we review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330955 - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
is properly challenged by certiorari, not by mandamus. See id. Brown’s failure to raise that issue in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33389 - 2014-09-15
is properly challenged by certiorari, not by mandamus. See id. Brown’s failure to raise that issue in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33389 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circumstances.” Id., ¶20. Evidence need not conclusively prove guilt to establish probable cause; an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145595 - 2017-09-21
of the circumstances.” Id., ¶20. Evidence need not conclusively prove guilt to establish probable cause; an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145595 - 2017-09-21