Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31151 - 31160 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 31151 - 31160 of 58509 for speedy trial.
State v. Roscoe Patterson
Patterson appeals from the trial court’s refusal to suppress drug evidence which the police discovered while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12650 - 2005-03-31
Patterson appeals from the trial court’s refusal to suppress drug evidence which the police discovered while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12650 - 2005-03-31
Family Services, Inc. v. Gary W.
Service’s first argument. However, we agree with its second argument and remand to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5922 - 2005-03-31
Service’s first argument. However, we agree with its second argument and remand to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5922 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J. 1 Andrew D. Birmingham asserts that the trial court erred when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18733 - 2017-09-21
. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J. 1 Andrew D. Birmingham asserts that the trial court erred when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18733 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
damage.” He thinks his trial and appellate counsel should have noticed his shortcomings. He also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260793 - 2020-05-19
damage.” He thinks his trial and appellate counsel should have noticed his shortcomings. He also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260793 - 2020-05-19
State v. Rayna J. Bauer
intoxicated, a violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), as a second offense. Bauer claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5388 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated, a violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), as a second offense. Bauer claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5388 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roscoe Patterson
the trial court’s refusal to suppress drug evidence which the police discovered while they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12650 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s refusal to suppress drug evidence which the police discovered while they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12650 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
if he refused consent. The trial court concluded LaFond had no constitutional or statutory right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54929 - 2010-09-27
if he refused consent. The trial court concluded LaFond had no constitutional or statutory right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54929 - 2010-09-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. It then admitted coverage for the engine damage prior to the April 28, 2008 trial, but disputed the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45687 - 2010-01-11
. It then admitted coverage for the engine damage prior to the April 28, 2008 trial, but disputed the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45687 - 2010-01-11
Jean Hobbs v. Milwaukee School of Engineering
. Stat. § 101.11 (2001-02).[1] Hobbs claims the trial court erred in determining that the defect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6779 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 101.11 (2001-02).[1] Hobbs claims the trial court erred in determining that the defect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6779 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
denying his claim that trial counsel had been ineffective for failing to call a witness at a suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28152 - 2007-02-20
denying his claim that trial counsel had been ineffective for failing to call a witness at a suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28152 - 2007-02-20