Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31161 - 31170 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 31161 - 31170 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Patel’s motion to suppress. We affirm. Background ¶2 The Waukesha county sheriff’s deputy who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112277 - 2017-09-21
Patel’s motion to suppress. We affirm. Background ¶2 The Waukesha county sheriff’s deputy who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112277 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
the inherent and statutory power to dismiss a charge on its own motion or to amend the pleadings sua sponte
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4469 - 2017-09-19
the inherent and statutory power to dismiss a charge on its own motion or to amend the pleadings sua sponte
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4469 - 2017-09-19
State v. Toran D. Brooks
-degree intentional homicide. Brooks claims that the trial court should have granted his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13635 - 2005-03-31
-degree intentional homicide. Brooks claims that the trial court should have granted his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13635 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mohns, Inc. v. TCF National Bank
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 FINE, J. Mohns, Inc., appeals an order granting TCF National Bank’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24621 - 2017-09-21
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 FINE, J. Mohns, Inc., appeals an order granting TCF National Bank’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24621 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a challenge to the circuit court’s denial of the mother’s motion to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189239 - 2017-09-21
be arguable merit to a challenge to the circuit court’s denial of the mother’s motion to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189239 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief. Hogenson argues his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14
his motion for postconviction relief. Hogenson argues his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
a charge on its own motion or to amend the pleadings sua sponte, this court reverses and remands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4469 - 2005-03-31
a charge on its own motion or to amend the pleadings sua sponte, this court reverses and remands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4469 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger W. Hubbard
2 no contest. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14523 - 2017-09-21
2 no contest. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14523 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
his postconviction motion. Arnold contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72534 - 2011-10-25
his postconviction motion. Arnold contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72534 - 2011-10-25
State v. John L. Dye, Jr.
motion.[2] He submits that the trial court erred: (1) in finding his attorney was not prejudicially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5897 - 2005-03-31
motion.[2] He submits that the trial court erred: (1) in finding his attorney was not prejudicially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5897 - 2005-03-31