Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31161 - 31170 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 31161 - 31170 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
this observation prior to the stop. This statement indicates that the trial court believed the trooper’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72524 - 2011-10-19
this observation prior to the stop. This statement indicates that the trial court believed the trooper’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72524 - 2011-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the home, they found the interior cluttered and torn up. ¶3 DeWitt took Puetzer’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35495 - 2009-02-09
the home, they found the interior cluttered and torn up. ¶3 DeWitt took Puetzer’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35495 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
than a blanket statement that Cockrell was not to come in to work. He also points out that he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181783 - 2017-09-21
than a blanket statement that Cockrell was not to come in to work. He also points out that he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181783 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the pretrial hearings and issues, voir dire, opening statements, witness testimony, jury instructions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645418 - 2023-04-18
of the pretrial hearings and issues, voir dire, opening statements, witness testimony, jury instructions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645418 - 2023-04-18
Wisconsin Department of Transportation v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
appealed to the condemnation commission or the circuit court. This statement is overly broad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11677 - 2005-03-31
appealed to the condemnation commission or the circuit court. This statement is overly broad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11677 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stanley Montelius
not disagree with those general statements, neither case governs here. As the State points out, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5133 - 2005-03-31
not disagree with those general statements, neither case governs here. As the State points out, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5133 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
disposition of the credibility dispute. We disagree. ¶9 As Holmes argues, the statements in Jackson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28152 - 2007-02-20
disposition of the credibility dispute. We disagree. ¶9 As Holmes argues, the statements in Jackson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28152 - 2007-02-20
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Sefton
the scene of the traffic stop. Armstrong believed that the statement of the lead cyclist that they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4477 - 2017-09-19
the scene of the traffic stop. Armstrong believed that the statement of the lead cyclist that they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4477 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
There was no objection by Her to the prosecutor’s statement. The court indicated that it had personally verified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30097 - 2014-09-15
There was no objection by Her to the prosecutor’s statement. The court indicated that it had personally verified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30097 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are clearly erroneous. While she submits an appendix identifying, for example, the neighbor’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929751 - 2025-03-19
are clearly erroneous. While she submits an appendix identifying, for example, the neighbor’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929751 - 2025-03-19