Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31161 - 31170 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 31161 - 31170 of 83395 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on February 20, 2014. In the second case appealed, Glinsey was charged as a repeater with being a party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05
on February 20, 2014. In the second case appealed, Glinsey was charged as a repeater with being a party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
suspensions was still pending and could not be used against him in the instant case. The court held a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32021 - 2008-03-11
suspensions was still pending and could not be used against him in the instant case. The court held a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32021 - 2008-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
subject matter jurisdiction, we noted “The cases Carter cites in support of his motion reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
subject matter jurisdiction, we noted “The cases Carter cites in support of his motion reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
Timothy G. Wolff v. Roger M. Coates
commissioner heard the case on July 6, 1998, and orally granted judgment to the Wolffs in the amount of $1601
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15326 - 2005-03-31
commissioner heard the case on July 6, 1998, and orally granted judgment to the Wolffs in the amount of $1601
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15326 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jay B. Stephany
initiates further communication. Id. at 484-85. In the present case, Stephany told Nordin that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12787 - 2017-09-21
initiates further communication. Id. at 484-85. In the present case, Stephany told Nordin that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12787 - 2017-09-21
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6480 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6480 - 2005-03-31
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6481 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6481 - 2005-03-31
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6482 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6482 - 2005-03-31
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6483 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6483 - 2005-03-31