Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31171 - 31180 of 62360 for child support.
Search results 31171 - 31180 of 62360 for child support.
[PDF]
State v. Ruven Seibert
. No. 03-1995 2 was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s denial of his petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6713 - 2017-09-20
. No. 03-1995 2 was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s denial of his petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6713 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Alan W. Gursky
). No. 97-3173-CR 4 We conclude that the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Gursky’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13214 - 2017-09-21
). No. 97-3173-CR 4 We conclude that the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Gursky’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13214 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
it is supported by probable cause. State v. Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 212, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). Fields does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88641 - 2012-10-24
it is supported by probable cause. State v. Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 212, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). Fields does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88641 - 2012-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not support that the unmistakable odor of marijuana was emanating from the vehicle. The record certainly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804505 - 2024-05-22
not support that the unmistakable odor of marijuana was emanating from the vehicle. The record certainly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804505 - 2024-05-22
[PDF]
State v. Kelly G. O'Shea
conclude there was no "accumulation of errors" to support a new trial, we reverse the order.2 On March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11707 - 2017-09-20
conclude there was no "accumulation of errors" to support a new trial, we reverse the order.2 On March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11707 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Glover
that reasonable suspicion supported the stop and probable cause supported the arrest. The court refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20709 - 2017-09-21
that reasonable suspicion supported the stop and probable cause supported the arrest. The court refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20709 - 2017-09-21
State v. David J. Brock
not supported by reasonable suspicion or probable cause. In response, the State relied, in part, on State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7631 - 2005-03-31
not supported by reasonable suspicion or probable cause. In response, the State relied, in part, on State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7631 - 2005-03-31
Martha Brock v. Milwaukee County Personnel Review Board
shows that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion, the facts fail to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12007 - 2005-03-31
shows that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion, the facts fail to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12007 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence supporting the Board’s determination, despite the supreme court’s limited mandate on remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62775 - 2011-04-11
of the evidence supporting the Board’s determination, despite the supreme court’s limited mandate on remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62775 - 2011-04-11
State v. Patrick A. Saunders
, but alleged no factual support for the allegations contained in his original motion. A hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8053 - 2005-03-31
, but alleged no factual support for the allegations contained in his original motion. A hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8053 - 2005-03-31