Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31171 - 31180 of 62360 for child support.
Search results 31171 - 31180 of 62360 for child support.
State v. David J. Brock
not supported by reasonable suspicion or probable cause. In response, the State relied, in part, on State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7631 - 2005-03-31
not supported by reasonable suspicion or probable cause. In response, the State relied, in part, on State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7631 - 2005-03-31
Martha Brock v. Milwaukee County Personnel Review Board
shows that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion, the facts fail to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12007 - 2005-03-31
shows that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion, the facts fail to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12007 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence supporting the Board’s determination, despite the supreme court’s limited mandate on remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62775 - 2011-04-11
of the evidence supporting the Board’s determination, despite the supreme court’s limited mandate on remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62775 - 2011-04-11
State v. Patrick A. Saunders
, but alleged no factual support for the allegations contained in his original motion. A hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8053 - 2005-03-31
, but alleged no factual support for the allegations contained in his original motion. A hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8053 - 2005-03-31
Bernadette Deal v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
) that LIRC’s order was not supported by credible and substantial evidence. ¶6 We review LIRC’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15643 - 2005-03-31
) that LIRC’s order was not supported by credible and substantial evidence. ¶6 We review LIRC’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15643 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
request for reverse waiver into juvenile court; (3) there was insufficient evidence to support the attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52364 - 2010-07-19
request for reverse waiver into juvenile court; (3) there was insufficient evidence to support the attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52364 - 2010-07-19
Gary A. Miller v. Jodi Lynn Ehrke
entirely fails to support his main argument, namely, that he was not required to obey the oral directive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6290 - 2005-03-31
entirely fails to support his main argument, namely, that he was not required to obey the oral directive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6290 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The evaluating psychologist concluded she was unable to support Reese’s plea, and he later withdrew
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144414 - 2017-09-21
. The evaluating psychologist concluded she was unable to support Reese’s plea, and he later withdrew
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144414 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed that he was coerced into pleading guilty during that meeting. In support of the claim, Graham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
claimed that he was coerced into pleading guilty during that meeting. In support of the claim, Graham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We conclude the evidence did not reasonably support those instructions. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521700 - 2022-05-18
. We conclude the evidence did not reasonably support those instructions. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521700 - 2022-05-18