Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31171 - 31180 of 68259 for law.

[PDF] State v. Demitrius Goodlow
question of law and fact. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14910 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law. ¶10 The review of a civil commitment order—determining whether the petitioner has met its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697185 - 2023-08-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was lawful, we accept Young’s argument in this regard. See Sweet v. Berge, 113 Wis. 2d 61, 67, 334 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295285 - 2020-10-14

State v. James L. Larson
principles to those facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5822 - 2005-03-31

State v. Agustin Velez
alleges facts entitling him or her to a hearing is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11315 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
videotaped statement to law enforcement was played for the jury. A computer forensics expert testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89960 - 2012-12-04

[PDF] Chandelle Enterprises, LLC v. XLNT Dairy Farm, Inc.
-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Steven J. Swanson of Swanson Law Office of St. Croix
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17903 - 2017-09-21

Danny B. Noble v. Deborah P. Noble
the value of the three properties at issue. In short, the law does not require a party to a prospective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19678 - 2005-10-27

2007 WI APP 152
This case requires that we interpret Wis. Stat. § 895.04(4), a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29238 - 2007-06-26

Susan L. Bellile v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s analysis. Id. Here, the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6164 - 2005-03-31