Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31171 - 31180 of 63636 for records.
Search results 31171 - 31180 of 63636 for records.
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110006 - 2014-04-03
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110006 - 2014-04-03
[PDF]
State v. Christopher A. Cody
discretion. See State v. Mosley, 201 Wis. 2d 36, 43, 547 N.W.2d 806 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15661 - 2017-09-21
discretion. See State v. Mosley, 201 Wis. 2d 36, 43, 547 N.W.2d 806 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15661 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kevin H. Gillson
, because absolutely nothing in the record discredited Stephanie’s testimony and statements to Bannon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13341 - 2017-09-21
, because absolutely nothing in the record discredited Stephanie’s testimony and statements to Bannon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13341 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Copus
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
effort to ask the court to place the instruction on the record. In any event, since the jury returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51500 - 2010-06-30
effort to ask the court to place the instruction on the record. In any event, since the jury returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51500 - 2010-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standards support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standards support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1967). Immel filed multiple responses. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Immel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794946 - 2024-05-01
(1967). Immel filed multiple responses. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Immel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794946 - 2024-05-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
physical placement. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843684 - 2024-08-29
physical placement. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843684 - 2024-08-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals a harassment injunction against him. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347313 - 2021-03-18
appeals a harassment injunction against him. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347313 - 2021-03-18
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Barnekow
right to testify finds no support in the record and provides no basis for relief. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21
right to testify finds no support in the record and provides no basis for relief. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21