Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31171 - 31180 of 63539 for records.
Search results 31171 - 31180 of 63539 for records.
Judith N. Nolan v. John R. Knight
, and a stamp recording the 8:10 a.m., October 15 service date and time. A separate original stamp confirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16292 - 2005-03-31
, and a stamp recording the 8:10 a.m., October 15 service date and time. A separate original stamp confirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16292 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John D. Mascaretti
that the parties had stipulated to the prior convictions. The record supports this assertion. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15614 - 2017-09-21
that the parties had stipulated to the prior convictions. The record supports this assertion. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15614 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581281 - 2022-10-25
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581281 - 2022-10-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
physical placement. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843684 - 2024-08-29
physical placement. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843684 - 2024-08-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, has not filed a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192823 - 2017-09-21
, has not filed a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192823 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192954 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192954 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, appellate courts [may] independently review the record to determine whether it provides a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110195 - 2014-04-14
, appellate courts [may] independently review the record to determine whether it provides a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110195 - 2014-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there is no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106875 - 2017-09-21
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there is no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106875 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144307 - 2015-07-14
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144307 - 2015-07-14
[PDF]
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
of the defendant's prior record was on file with the Court in the [check charge] case where the defendant filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11445 - 2017-09-19
of the defendant's prior record was on file with the Court in the [check charge] case where the defendant filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11445 - 2017-09-19