Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31171 - 31180 of 83433 for simple case search.
Search results 31171 - 31180 of 83433 for simple case search.
State v. Travis Blanks
. The case went to trial on July 18, 1994, after two earlier adjustments and the withdrawal of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8701 - 2005-03-31
. The case went to trial on July 18, 1994, after two earlier adjustments and the withdrawal of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and lacking merit. Brown asserts that WIS. STAT. § 973.15(2) (1979-80) prohibits his sentences in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48910 - 2014-09-15
and lacking merit. Brown asserts that WIS. STAT. § 973.15(2) (1979-80) prohibits his sentences in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48910 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the solicitation to intimidate the victim’s parents. On the State’s motion, this case was joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
on the solicitation to intimidate the victim’s parents. On the State’s motion, this case was joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Wandell Lee
motion for sentence modification. The circuit court denied the motion, and Lee appeals. ¶5 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26213 - 2017-09-21
motion for sentence modification. The circuit court denied the motion, and Lee appeals. ¶5 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26213 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
suspensions was still pending and could not be used against him in the instant case. The court held a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32021 - 2008-03-11
suspensions was still pending and could not be used against him in the instant case. The court held a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32021 - 2008-03-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the State failed to establish venue in his case. He further contends that two of his convictions were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231508 - 2019-01-02
that the State failed to establish venue in his case. He further contends that two of his convictions were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231508 - 2019-01-02
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jones
-96] states: “A jury in [] misdemeanor case[s] shall consist of 6 persons.” The legislature enacted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
-96] states: “A jury in [] misdemeanor case[s] shall consist of 6 persons.” The legislature enacted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
objected. The trial court then went on to discuss whether the State’s case relied on No. 2019AP2138
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270840 - 2020-07-21
objected. The trial court then went on to discuss whether the State’s case relied on No. 2019AP2138
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270840 - 2020-07-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231239 - 2018-12-26
we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231239 - 2018-12-26
State v. Derick D. Bostick
involving Bostick. Both incidents were strikingly similar to the facts alleged against Bostick in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10569 - 2005-03-31
involving Bostick. Both incidents were strikingly similar to the facts alleged against Bostick in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10569 - 2005-03-31