Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31181 - 31190 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31181 - 31190 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 23, 2012 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78455 - 2012-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 23, 2012 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78455 - 2012-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
, we conclude that the trial court properly admitted the other acts evidence in this case. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36801 - 2009-06-16
, we conclude that the trial court properly admitted the other acts evidence in this case. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36801 - 2009-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
person,” in light of the fact that intent was a “consequential fact” in the case. The court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99899 - 2013-07-24
person,” in light of the fact that intent was a “consequential fact” in the case. The court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99899 - 2013-07-24
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 3, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104993 - 2013-12-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 3, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104993 - 2013-12-02
COURT OF APPEALS
agree with the circuit court’s conclusion that “[t]he facts in this case were overwhelming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118288 - 2014-07-29
agree with the circuit court’s conclusion that “[t]he facts in this case were overwhelming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118288 - 2014-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 1, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34163 - 2008-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 1, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34163 - 2008-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
placement. Gutting’s analysis is incorrect. The court properly viewed this case as a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105006 - 2013-12-02
placement. Gutting’s analysis is incorrect. The court properly viewed this case as a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105006 - 2013-12-02
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 26, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120140 - 2014-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 26, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120140 - 2014-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 11, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90237 - 2012-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 11, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90237 - 2012-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
grounds that Griffin and other cases have made available. By the Court.—Orders affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30704 - 2007-10-24
grounds that Griffin and other cases have made available. By the Court.—Orders affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30704 - 2007-10-24